[2025:JHHC:30014] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8287 of 2025 ------ Mehboob Ansari @ Mehbub Ansari, aged about 35 years, son of Jakir Hussain, resident of Village-Fatehpur, P.O. & P.S.-Fatehpur, Dist.-Jamtara, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25-09-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.99 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.263 of 2024 subsequently S.T. Case No.76 of 2025 registered under Section 109(1) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and 27 of the Arms Act and the cognizance has been taken under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 25(1-b) (a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person attempted to murder the informant and Mahendra Sah. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Though the informant claims that he can identify the assailants but the petitioner has not yet been put up on Test Identification Parade as mentioned in para-9 of the Bail Application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case. It is further submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No.6861 of 2025 vide order dated 08.08.2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.03.2025 as is evident from para-12 of the instant bail application and charge- sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Jamtara, in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.99 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.263 of 2024 subsequently S.T. Case No.76 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 25.09.2025 Rohit/