Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24142 (GAU)

SRI KARNA PEGU v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/1105/2025 · 2025-11-12

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010221532025 2025:GAU-AS:15357 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1105/2025 SRI KARNA PEGU S/O MANDU PEGU R/O VILL- JARIGURI PAKANIA P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:RAJEN PAYENG S/O PADMADHAR PAYENG R/O VILL- JARIGURI PAKANIA P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S GOGOI, MS A GOGOI,MS G GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 13.11.2025 Heard Mr. S. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P. for the State. Page No.# 2/2 2. This I.A. has been preferred seeking correction of certain typographical errors in the order dated 28.08.2025 passed by this Court in Bail Appln No. 2522/2025. At Paragraph No.3 of the said order the date of arrest has been wrongly typed as 22.05.2025 whereas the actual date is 22.06.2025. Further, at Paragraph No.5 instead of CJM, Lakhimpur, it should be Special Judge, (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur. 3. Upon perusal of the record it appears that the aforesaid errors have crept into the order dated 28.08.2025. 4. Accordingly, the date 22.05.2025 in paragraph No.3 of the order shall be read as 22.06.2025 and the words CJM, Lakhimpur shall be read as Special Judge, (POCSO), Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur in the aforesaid order dated 28.08.2025 passed in BA No. 2522/2025. This order shall be read as part of the aforesaid order dated 28.08.2025. 5. The I.A. stands allowed accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant