Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24128 (AP)

Boori Nanibabu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh through the Station House Officer, Thondangi Police Station

CRLP/7039/2025 · 2025-08-11

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR TUESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :pRESENT|. THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO-. 7039 OF 2025 Between I. Boori Nanibabu @ Nani, S/o. Chakrarao, Age 40 years, R/o. SC colony, Kodada Village, Thondangi Mandal, Kakinada District. petitioner/Accusec! AND I/ The State of Andhra Pradesh through the Station House Officer, Thondangi Police Station, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, At Amaravathi Respondent/Complainant petit-Ion under section 484, 483 (1), 483 (1) (b) of BNSS is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal petition, the High Court may be Pleased tO relax the COndit'lOn No.(b) The petitioner /Accused should not leave the jurisdiction Of the COurf imposed by the Hon'ble Court of Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate ,Tuni dt. 21.05.2025 in Crl.MP.No 16112025 in so far aS the Petitioner Should not leave the Jur'lsd'lction of the COurf, in the -Interests Of Justice. The petition/Appeal coming On for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in suppo+I thereof and upon hear'lng the arguments Of sri RAMA CHANDRA REDDY VUPPADA Advocate for the Petitioner, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) for the Respondent and the Court made the following. This criminal petitI-On, under Sections 484, 483 (1) and 483 (1) (b) of Bharatiya Nagarjk suraksha sanhjta is filed by the petjtjoner-accused seeking to relax condjtjon No. (b) I[mPOSed by order dated 27-06-2025 jn criminal M.P.Not 1622 of 2025 on the file of the court of learned Addj{ional Judicial Magl-strafe of I class, Tuni, whereby the petitioner- accused is directed not to leave the jurisdictI-On Of the Court. 2.` Today when the matter is taken up for heart-ng, there is no- representation on behalf of the petjtI'Oner-accused. Learned Assistant pubII'C Prosecutor would submit that charge sheet has already been fl[led by the investI'gating offl-cer in this case. 3. ln view of the above submission of learned AssI-Slant Public prosecutorJ COndl-tI-On No. (b) I-mposed by order dated 27-06-2025 in criminal M.P.No. 1622 of 2025 on the file of the court of learned Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Tuni, is hereby relaxed. 4. The criminal petI-lion iS aCCOrdinglyallowedI SD/-N.NAGAMMA ASSISTANT llSTRAR F //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Additional Judic'lal First Class Magistrate ,Tuni. 2. The Station H6use officer, Thondangi Police Station, Kakinada District. 3. One CC to SRl. RAMA CHANDRA REDDY VUPPADA Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor (AP) High Court ofA.P., Amaravati [OUT]. 5. One spare copy `\ I _ * HIGH COURT DR.YLR]J DATE D : 12/08/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLPINo.7039 of 2025 ALLOWED