Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24127 (RAJ)

VIKRAM SON OF SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/248/2025 · 2025-07-28

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:28185-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 248/2025 Vikram Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Dhani, Dhakrawali, Tan Kariri, Police Station Amarsar, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Additional Director General Of Police Anti Human Trafficking, Unit Jaipur. 3. The Inspector Genral Of Police, Range Jaipur Rural. 4. Superintendent Of Police, District Jaipur Rural. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Amarsar, Jaipur (Rural) 6. Vinod Yadav Son Of Shri Hanuman Sahay Yadav, Resident Of Village Bandrol, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Arun Singh, SI/SHO, P.S. Amarsar. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 28/07/2025 Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General submits the status report dated 27.07.2025, according to which the corpus is not in any illegal detention. It is stated that the corpus has given her statement before the concerned SHO on [2025:RJ-JP:28185-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-248/2025] 12.07.2025, wherein she affirmed that she has solemnized the marriage as per her own free will. She is a post-graduate and is residing with her husband voluntarily. Her signatures have also been obtained in the case diary. In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/6