- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3229 RFA No. 1269 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1269 OF 2019 (POS) BETWEEN: 1. GEETHA W/O LATE KANIKRAJ, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. 2. SMT. ANTHONY MARY D/O LATE KANIKRAJ, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, 3. SMT.SAGAI MARY D/O LATE KANIKRAJ, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, 4. SMT PUSHPA D/O LATE KANIKRAJ, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, 5. KUM. JYOTHI D/O LATE KANIKRAJ, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT DORESANIPALYA, 1ST CROSS, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, ILK POST, BENGALURU-76. 6. SAGAY RAJ S/O LATE AROGYASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.12/619/6, DORESANI PALYA, BILEKAHALLI, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3229 RFA No. 1269 of 2019 BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-560 076. …APPELLANTS [ABSENT] AND: P.M.ANTHONAPPA S/O PUTTAMARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO.39, ADARSHA NILAYA, DORESANI PALYA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 076. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. DEEPIKA., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. RAKSHITHA.D.J., ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants are absent. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appellants was represented by counsel Sri.R.Shashidhara., and he was permitted to retire from the case and the office was directed to - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3229 RFA No. 1269 of 2019 print the names of the appellants in the cause list and the appeal was ordered to be listed on 24.01.2025. The appeal is listed today by showing the names of the appellants in the cause list. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The appeal is pending for almost six years. As already noted above, the names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants are absent. It appears that the appellants are not diligent in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46