Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24121 (PAT)

Karelal Koda @ Pyarelal Koda v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./21184/2025 · 2025-04-23

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21184 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2018 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Karelal Koda @ Pyarelal Koda Son of Dina Koda village- Kanimoh, Ps- Bannu Bagicha, Dist- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 23-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 11 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 23 of U.A.P. Act. 3. As per the allegation, 43 named accused persons including the petitioner as also 40-45 unknown persons alleged to be naxals by the police, had assembled for commission of offence, according to the information received by the police. The further allegation is that there were firing and cross-firing, as a result, one Constable got injured by the bullet injury. 4. The petitioner is a naxal. The naxals have fired Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21184 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2 upon the police and injuries have been caused to the police party. The petitioner is in custody since 28.08.2024. Nine serious and similar cases are pending against the petitioner. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. P. Kumar (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T