Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24121 (JHR)

CHETLAL MANDAL v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5150/2025 · 2025-09-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27227 --1-- A.B.A. No. 5150 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5150 of 2025 ---- Chetlal Mandal, age about 25 years, son of Bhalinath Mandal @ Mali Nath Mandal, resident of village – Nimtand, PO and PS – Tundi, District - Dhanbad .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Advocate ---- 04/09.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhanbad Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.04 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 102(B) and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of I.T. Act pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that allegation is made that on seeing the police force the petitioner fled away. He further submits that same allegation is made against the co-accused person and due to that name of the petitioner has come in the FIR and petitioner has got one criminal antecedent in which the petitioner has been acquitted. He submits that the co-accused has 2025:JHHC:27227 --2-- A.B.A. No. 5150 of 2025 been directed to surrender before the learned Court in ABA No.4964 of 2025. He submits that the same allegations are there against the petitioner and in view of that same order may kindly be passed. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that one mobile phone was used in cyber-crime and when location of said mobile was traced and police reached there, the petitioner has fled away along with others. 5. In view of above and considering that only allegation is made that petitioner has fled away and in one case the petitioner has already been acquitted, petitioner above named is directed to surrender before learned court within two weeks from today and learned court shall release petitioner, above named, on such terms and conditions as well as sureties as learned court may deem fit and proper. 6. This petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/