APHC010341002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1658 OF 2025 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the Docket Order dated 2.7.2025 passed in I.A.No. 118 of 2025 in O.S.No. 50 of 2025 on the file of Court of Hon'ble Additional Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Chittoor District. Between: M, Munikrishna Reddy, S/o, Late C.Munaswamy, aged Hindu, Business, residing at D.No.71-173, Kummara and District about 78 Years, Street, Chittoor Town ...PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF AND 1. P Vidyasagar Reddy, S/o. Late P. Sivarama years, Hindu, Cultivation, residing at Periambadi Village Yadamari Mandal, Chittoor District 2. P Chendhamarai, W/ years, Hindu, Reddy, aged about 59 and Post, o. late P. Amaranadha Reddy, aged about 68 House wife, resident of Periambadi Village and Post, Yadamari Mandal, Chittoor District 3. P Vanajakshamma, W/ o P. Sivarama Reddy, aged 80 years, Hindu, resident of Periambadi Village and Post, Yadamari Mandal Chittoor District 4. Smt L Ramadevi, W/ o. S.V.Lakshminarayana D/o. Late P.Sivarama Reddy, aged about 65 years, Hindu, House wife residing at No. 18, Guruswamy Mudaliar Road, Chennai 5. Smt Vijayanthi Reddy, D/o P. Nithyananda Reddy, aged 55 resident of Ponniamman Kovil Street, Chittoor 6. P Vinod Reddy, S/o. P.Nithyananda Reddy, aged about 53 Hindu, Resident of Ponniamman Kovil Street, Chittoor 7. Sheela Reddy, D/o.P.Nithyananda Reddy, aged about 50 years, Hindu, Resident of Pormiamman Kovil Street, Chittoor District years. years. 8. P Sulochanamma, W/o Manohar Reddy, aged about 69 years, Hindu Chithapara Village and Post Gudipala Mandal, Chittoor District 9. P Srinivas Varaprasad Reddy, S/o Late P. Manohara Reddy, aged about 53 years, Hindu, Chithapara Village and Post, Gudipala Mandal, Chittoor District 10. P Sridhar Reddy, S/ o Late P. Manohar Reddy, aged about 50 years, Hindu, Mandal, Chittoor District residing at Chithapara Village and Post, Gudipala 11. P Sreekar Reddy, S/o Late P. Manohar Reddy, aged about 47 R/o Chithapara Village and Post, Gudipala Mandal, years, Hindu, Chittoor District ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANT lA NO: 1 OF 202fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim injunction in favour of the petitioner, restraining the Respondents, their men, and agents from in any way interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the plaint schedule property or evicting him therefrom, pending disposal of CRP No. 19 of 2025 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI N RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents Nos.9&10 : SRI HARSHA VARDHANA RAO C Counsel for the Respondents Nos.1,2,4 : SRI S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents Nos 6&7 : SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010341002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI {Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1658/2025 Between: 1.M. MUNIKRISHNA REDDY, S/0. LATE C.MUNASWAMY, ABOUT 78 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT D.NO.71-173, KUMMARA STREET, CHITTOOR TOWN AND DISTRICT AGED ...PETITIONER AND 1. P VIDYASAGAR REDDY, S/0. LATE P. SIVARAMA REDDY, AGED CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT AND POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, ABOUT 59 YEARS, HINDU, PERIAMBADI VILLAGE CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. P CHENDHAMARAI, W/ O. LATE P. AMARANADHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, HINDU, PERIAMBADI CHITTOOR DISTRICT HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST, YADAMARI MANDAL, 3. P VANAJAKSHAMMA, W/ O P. SIVARAMA REDDY, AGED 80 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDENT OF PERIAMBADI VILLAGE AND POST, YADAMARI MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. SMT L RAMADEVI, W/ O. S.V.LAKSHMINARAYANA D/0. LATE P.SIVARAMA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSE WIFE RESIDING AT NO. 18, GURUSWAMY MUDALIAR ROAD, CHENNAI 5. SMT VIJAYANTHI REDDY, D/0 P. NITHYANANDA REDDY, AGED PONNIAMMAN KOVIL STREET, 55 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 'V 2 HBKMJ C.R.P.No.l€58of2025 A CHITTOOR 6. P VINOD REDDY, S/0. P.NITHYANANDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDENT OF PONNIAMMAN KOVIL STREET CHITTOOR 7. SHEELA REDDY, D/0.P.NITHYANANDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDENT OF PORMIAMMAN KOVIL STREET CHITTOOR DISTRICT 8. P SULOCHANAMMA, W/0 MANOHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, HINDU, CHITHAPARA VILLAGE AND POST GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 9. P SRINIVAS VARAPRASAD REDDY, S/0 LATE P. MANOHARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HINDU, CHITHAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 10. P SRIDHAR REDDY, S/ O LATE P. MANOHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT CHITHAPARA VILLAGE AND POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 11.P SREEKAR REDDY, S/0 LATE P. MANOHAR ABOUT 47 YEARS, HINDU, POST, GUDIPALA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT REDDY, AGED R/0 CHITHAPARA VILLAGE AND ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.N RANGA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. HARSHA VARDHANA RAO C 2.S LAKSHM INARAYANA REDDY 3.P NAGENDRA REDDY 3 HBKMJ , C.R.P.No.l658of2025 t The Court made the following Order; Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for some of the respondents. This revision is filed against the docket order passed in I.A.No. 118 of 2. 2025 in O.S.No.50 of 2025 on the file of Additional Civil Judge, Chittoor (Senior Division), dated 02.07.2025, which is as under: “Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record. Issue urgent notice to the respondent Nos. 1 to 11. Gallon 16.07.2025.” Even according to the learned counsels’ submissions on both the sides. 3. the I.A.No.118 of 2025 has come up before the trial Court in the above said suit and on the first occasion only, after hearing the petitioner/plaintiff therein passed the above said docket order. Some of the respondents/defendants therein received the notices and 4. they are about to file counters also in the said I.A. But hurriedly, in view of the urgency involved, the petitioner/plaintiff filed this revision against the above said docket order, ordering urgent notice. This is not a stage, where this Court can express any opinion on the 5. merits of the above said I.A., which is seized before the trial Court by way of issuing urgent notice for the purpose of consideration of the said I.A. 4 HBKM,J C.R.P.No.l658of2025 6. Hence, to enable the trial Court to proceed with the I.A. in accordance with law giving due opportunity to all the parties concerned for passing appropriate orders, this C.R.P. is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the above said I.A. as expeditiously as possible strictly in accordance with law and both the parties shall co-operate for the early disposal of the I.A. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be 7. no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand dosed. SD/- B.PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ^TlS^OFFICER //TRUE COPY// SE To, 1. The Additional Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Chittoor District. 2. One CC to SRI. N RANGA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. HARSHA VARDHANA RAO C Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to SRI. P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 6. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 7. Two CD Copies mkp TAC HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 1658 OF 2025 ^ 18 AUG 2025 m ^SCigwitSKtiaaXfei o Co DISPOSING THE CRP