APHC010341362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17353/2025 Between: 1. YARLAGADDA BHARAT KUMAR, , S/O. Y. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS,OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO.64-27-1, L.B.S. NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522020. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, , GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 4TH TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. P DAWOOD KHAN PATHAN DAWOOD KHAN, , S/O. LATE MAHABOOB KHAN, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, 2 R/O.H.NO.39-7-A-5, K.V.R. GARDEN, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action on petitioner's representation dated 23-06-2025 which was made against in interference of the 5th respondent Police in Civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioner to come to his police station to settle the civil disputes in his police station though the litigation pending before the Competent Civil Court, Criminal Court and this Hon'ble court, which is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to law and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere in Civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioner to come to the police stations to settle the civil dispute in police stations and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant the interim directions directing the respondents 1 to 4 to take action on petitioner’s representation dated 23- 06-2015 further direction to the 5th respondent not to interfere in civil disputes, calling, threatening the petitioner to come to his police station, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17353 of 2025 ORDER:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.5, at the behest of respondent No.6, is interfering in civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.6. It is submitted that the sale deed of the year 1933 is under dispute and in that regard, the 6th respondent had filed W.P.No.4647 of 2017 seeking cancellation of General Power of Attorney pertaining to the year 2015. The said Writ Petition was subsequently withdrawn with a liberty to approach the Civil Court. Instead of approaching the Civil Court, the 6th respondent has filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner, police have filed charge sheet and the same was numbered as C.C.No.1025 of 2023. Thereafter, the 6th respondent filed W.P.No.2654 of 2024 seeking cancellation of G.P.A. suppressing the filing of earlier writ petition and withdrawing the same. Pending all this, the 5th respondent is now interested in settling the dispute by assuming the role of Civil Court. 3. Considering the submissions, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at the admission stage by directing respondent No.5 not to 4 interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.6 without following the due process of law. 4. With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt: 11.07.2025 sj 5 110 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17353 of 2025 Dt: 11.07.2025 sj