Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9901 MFA No. 2624 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2624 OF 2017 (MV-I) BETWEEN:
MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MINISWAMAPPA AGED 54 YEARS, R/A SUBBARAYAPPA, KATTIGENAHALLI, YELAHANKA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 064 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SRIDHAR D.S., ADVOCATE- ABSENT)
AND:
1.
MURTHAPPA, MAJOR FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE APPELLANT, JINKEBACHAHALLI, DOODA TUMKUR POST DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU-561 203
2.
M/S NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.144, SUBBARAM COMPLEX, M.G.ROAD BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. L.SREEKANTA RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:17.12.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.368/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE XXI A.C.M.M AND XXIII A.S.C.J, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION.
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9901 MFA No. 2624 of 2017
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL JUDGMENT On 07.01.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again when the matter came up on 06.03.2025, even on that day also, there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of both the parties. It appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11