Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24113 (AP)

RAM PRIYA MEDAPATI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17373/2025 · 2025-07-31

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010341342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17373/2025 Between: 1. RAM PRIYA MEDAPATI, D/O MEDAPATI SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS, DOCTOR, RESIDING AT DORNAKAL ROAD, SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER, MEDAPATI SATYANARAYANA REDDY. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, VIJAYWADA ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IV TOWN LAW AND ORDER POLICE STATION, SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. DR MULLANGI SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. LATE SRI RAMACHANDRA REDDY AGE 36 YEARS OCC. NEONATOLOGIST R/O. GIGGLES, RK OMNI HOSPITAL, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD OPP. LIONS CLUB OFFICE, RAMNAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. MULLANGI NAGA RATNA KUMARI, W/O LATE SRI RAMACHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, C/O. MULLANGI SRINIVASA REDDY, FLAT NO.302, SATYAM SUKRUTHI APARTMENT, DOOR NO.50-25-2, PANJABI DABA BEHIND REAL DEEPAK STREET, TPT COLONY, SEETHAMAADHARA, VISHAKAPATTANAM 7. POTHULA APPAREDDY, PURCHASE OFFICER QUATER NO C- 119 NTPC DEPANJALI NAGAR VISAKHAPATNAM 531020 8. POTHULA CHAITANYA DEVI, W/O POTHULA APPAREDDY PURCHASE OFFICER QUATER NO C- 119 NTPC DEPANJALI NAGAR VISAKHAPATNAM 531020. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PECHATHY RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 2. GUNDAPU RAJESH KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a writ or order more particularaly one in the nature of writ of Mandamaus declaring inaction of the Respondents Nos.2 to 4 not taking any action on the report dated 13.2.2025 given by the petitioner to the Respondent No.4/S H O Surya Rao Peta Police subsequent letter dated 19.2.2025 of the petitioner to the Respondents Nos 2 and 3 explanation dated 27.5.2025 of Petitioners father are illlegal arbitrary consequently direct the Respondents Nos 2 to 4 to take necessary action on the report dated 13.2.2025 letter dated 19.2.2025 by the petitioner Explanation dated 27.5.2025 given by the petitioners father Medapati Satyanarayana Reddy by examine him and his witnesse” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representation requesting the registration of a case against the unofficial respondent, but no case has been registered. 4. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that a complaint was received from the petitioner, and asked her to submit relevant documents; however, she did not turn up. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner received no information from the police regarding the registration of the case, and came to know through an RTI reply that the case does not fall within the jurisdiction of the concerned police station. 3 6. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is liberty to approach the police by furnishing relevant documents and pursue her case. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.08.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17373 of 2025 Dt.01.08.2025 Asr