[2025:RJ-JP:33941] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8837/2025 Jasram S/o Hariram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Padli, P.S. Balghat, District Karauli (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Gangapurcity). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nitin Jain, Adv. for Mr. R.D. Meena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 26/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.92/2024, registered at Police Station Batoda, District Gangapur City, for the offence(s) under Sections 420 and 409 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 409 of IPC. It is contended that the petitioner was arrested on 17.04.2025 and the charge-sheet has already been produced. It is alleged against the petitioner that he committed misappropriation of Rs.18,42,950/-, there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and trial of the case may take considerable time. It is also contended that the accused- [2025:RJ-JP:33941] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8837/2025] petitioner has already deposited Rs.5,50,000/- in the postal department, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner being posted as public servant misappropriated the amount deposited by the various depositor in their recurring accounts and other accounts, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be dismissed. 5. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the petitioner is a public servant and is in custody since long and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioner- Jasram S/o Hariram, in connection with FIR No.92/2024, registered at Police Station Batoda, District Gangapur City, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-97