IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13809 of 2025 Date of Decision: 28.08.2025 _______________________________________________________ Veena Tanwar …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record Notification dated 27.08.2025, issued under the signatures of Secretary (PW) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that relief, as prayed for, in the instant petition sands granted to the petitioner and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that on the recommendation of Departmental Promotion Committee, petitioner 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 herein, who at present is working as Superintendent G-1, has been promoted to the post of Registrar (Class-I) in the Level-17 of pay matrix Rs. 53600-170100/- on regular basis, with immediate effect, in public interest. Since petitioner had prayed for relief, which otherwise stands granted in her favour vide Notification dated 27.08.2025, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and accordingly, same is disposed of, as having rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 28,2025 (shankar)