4.: APHC010340612024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE (Q.ir: o /% • /i PRESENT c- THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 1769 OF 2024 Petition under Section 115 of CPC being aggrieved by the Order dated 19.07.2024 passed in E.P. No. 26 of 2023 in O.S. No. 395 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole. Between: Ikkurthi Nagaraju, S/o. Kotaiah, Aged 36 years, Occ. Agriculturist, R/o Endluru village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner/J.Dr./Defendant AND Kolasani Anjaneyulu, S/o. Koteswarlu, Aged 53 years, Occ. Agriculturist, R/o. Endluru Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondent/D.Hr./Plaintiff lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Order dated 19.07.2024 passed in E.P. No. 26 of 2023 in O.S. No. 395 of 2017 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge at Ongole including arrest/detention of petitioner, pending disposal of main Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI Counsel for the Respondent: SRI YADAVALLI RAMESH The Court made the following ORDER: % APHC010340612024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] m FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1769/2024 Between: ...PETITIONER Ikkurthi Nagaraju AND ...RESPONDENT Kolasani Anjaneyulu Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI Counsel for the Respondent: 1.YADAVALLI RAMESH *3 2 6- The Court made the following order; When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has given up vakalat in the matter. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the cause in the revision petition does not survive inasmuch as the execution petition was closed, granting liberty to the decree holder to move application for re-open of this EP after closure of the insolvency proceedings, filed by the petitioner. 3. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole. One CC to Sri. Anup Koushik Karavadi, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Yadavalli Ramesh, Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. Chp sree fp ft HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 ORDER CRP No.1769 OF 2024 DISMISSING THE C.R.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS