9 APHC010339562025 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE SUBBA WRIT PETITION NO: OF o -f or >o REDDY SATTI Between: T Challa Ranga Naidu years,R/o.D,no.1-222, D.Cherlopalli Vilage, Bathalapalle Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District. 2. Challa Krishna Murthy, S/o. Roshanha, Aged about years,R/o.D.no. 1-222 S/o. Roshanna, Aged about above 48 Mandal, above 55 D.Cherlopalli Vilage, Bathalapalle Mandal Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District. 3. Challa Sriramulu, S/o. Roshanna, Aged about above 67 years Bathalapalle Mandal, R/o.D.no.1-368, D.Cherlopalli Vilage, Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District. 4. Challa Narayana Swamy, S/o. Roshanna , Aged about above 48 Bathalapalle Mandal, years R/o.D.no.1-228, D.Cherlopalli Vilage, Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District. ...PETITIONERS AND Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue J, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh Dharmavaram Division, Sri Satya Sai 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, District. 3. The Tahsildar, Bathalapalle Mandal, 4. The Mandal Surveyor, Bathalapalle Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. . Sri Satya Sai District. 5. The Village Surveyor, D. Cherlopalli Village, Bathalapalle Manclal,Sri Satya Sai District. 6. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Bathalapalle Mandal 7. R. Vijay Kumar, S/o. Venkataramana Naidu Village and Mandal. 8. R. Venkat Prasad, S/o. Venkataramana Nikethan Layout, Bannerukatta, Bangalore. i?<{' Sri Satya District. Madhuranagar, Garldine Naidu, D/o. No 599 B, Santhi -RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction, Writ of Mandamus, declaring the may be particularly one in the nature of action of the respondents no's 3 to 5 to on the F- line application FSNV012500779168 02.07,2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violations of Article consequently direct the respondent no’s.S to 5 to conduct the of boundaries for Sy.No 132 situated conduct Afresh survey dated 14, 21 and 300A and survey for fixing at D.Cheriopalli Vilage, Bathalapalle Mandal, Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 900^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no’s.3 to 5 to conduct the for Sy.No132 situated survey for fixing of boundaries at D.Cheriopalli Vilage, Bathalapalle Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District above writ petition. Mandal, District pending disposal of the Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. SRINIVAS Coun^I Counsel for the Respondent No.6: •° 5:GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos 7 « The Court made the following order: GP FOR HOME & 8: SRI P. SAI SURYA TEJA ^ APHC010339562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 16995/2025 Between; CHALLA RANGA NAIDU, S/0. ROSHANNA, AGED ‘ABOUT ABOVE 48 YEARS,R/O.D.NO.1-222, D.CHERLOPALLl VILAGE, BATHALAPALLE ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT NOW SRI SATYA DISTRICT. 1. MANDAL, 2.CHALLA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/0. ROSHANNA, AGED ABOUT ABOVE 55 YEARS,R/O.D.NO. 1-222 D.CHERLOPALLl VILAGE, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT NOW SRI SATYA DISTRICT. 3.CHALLA SRIRAMULU,, S/0. ROSHANNA, AGED ABOUT ABOVE 67 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-368, D.CHERLOPALLl VILAGE, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT NOW SRI SATYA DISTRICT. 4.CHALLA NARAYANA SWAMY, ,S/0. ROSHANNA, AGED ABOUT ABOVE 48 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-228, D.CHERLOPALLl VILAGE, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT NOW SRI SATYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1 THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUEDEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2.THE REVENUE SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DHARMAVARAM DIVISION, SK W.P.No. 16995 of 20; 3.THE TAHSILDAR, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL DISTRICT. 4.THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5.THE VILLAGE SURVEYOR, BATHALAPALLE MANDAL,SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 6.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, BATHAIAPALLE MANDAL SATYA DISTRICT. SRI SATYA SAI D. CHERLOPALLI VILLAGE, SRI 7.R VIJAY KUMAR, ,S/0. MADHURANAGAR, GARLDINE VILLAGE AND MANDAL. VENKATARAMANA NAIDU 8.R VENKAT PRASAD, S/0. VENKATARAMANA NAIDU , D/0. NO 599 B, SANTHI NIKETHAN LAYOUT, BANNERUKATTA, BANGALORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents no's 3 to 5 to conduct Afresh survey on the F- line application FSNV012500779168 dated 02.07.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violations of Article 14 ^ , 21 and 300A and consequently direct the respondent no's.3 to 5 to conduct the survey for fixing of boundaries for Sy.No 132 situated at D.Cheriopalli Vilage Bathaiapalle Mandal, Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District forthwith pass and lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent no’s.3 to 5 to conduct the survey for fixing of boundaries for Sy.No 132 situated at D.Cheriopalli Vilage, Bathaiapalle Mandal, Ananthapur District Now Sri Satya District Districtpending disposal the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.KSRINIVAS of jge 3 of 5 SRS,J W.P.No.16995 of 2025 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.GP FOR REVENUE 3.P SAI SURYATEJA The Court made the following: :: ORDER:: Heard K. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents 1 to 5, Sri Ajay, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.6 and Sri Surya Teja, learned counsel for respondents 7 and 8. The grievance of the petitioners is that they made an F-line application vide NO.FSNV012500779168 dated 02.07.2025 by paying the necessary fee to respondent No.3, to conduct a fresh survey and demarcate the boundaries in respect of land of an extent of Ac. 15-92 cents in survey No. 132, D. Cherlopalli village, Bathalapalle Mandal, Ananthapur District (Sri Satya Sai District). However, the survey has not been conducted. Hence, the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that earlier, on an application made by respondents 7 and 8, a survey was conducted, in respect of their land of an extent of Ac.26-51 cents in survey No. 130, which is adjacent to the petitioners’ land, without issuing notice to the petitioners. The officials failed to furnish a copy of the survey report. Thereafter, the petitioners made F-line application for conducting a fresh survey. 3. Learned counsel for respondents 7 and 8 would submit that survey was conducted in respect of land of an extent of Ac.26-51 cents in survey No.130 and the petitioners being adjacent owners attended the survey. However, did not sign survey report. 4. SRS, W.P.No.16995 of 2025) 5. This court, at this juncture is not going into the allegations and counter ^ allegations. The grievance of the petitioners is that respondents 3 and 4 are not conducting survey pursuant to F-line application dated 02.07.2025 (Ex.PI) made by the petitioner. 6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that the authorities will conduct survey and fix the boundaries within six weeks. 7. Given the above facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on survey in respect survey No. 132, D. Cherlopalli village, Bathalapalle Mandal, Ananthapur District (Sri Satya Sai District), duly issuing notice to the petitioners as well as all boundary owners. Respondents 4 and 5 shall consider the objections of the petitioners or other boundary owners while conducting survey and demarcating the boundaries. No either side directing learned respondents 4 and 5 to conduct of land of an extent of Ac. 15-92 cents in costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, “ Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, District. Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue ) Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh Dharmavaram Division, Sri Satya Sai 3. The Tahsildar, Bathalapalle Mandal, r 4. The Mandal Surveyor, Bathalapalle Mandal, 5. The Village Surveyor, Satya Sai District. 6. The Sub-Inspector of Police Sri Satya Sai District. Sri Satya Sai District. D. Cherlopalli Village, Bathalapalle Mandal Sri Bathalapalle Mandal, Sri Satya District. • One CC to Sri K. Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to Sri P. Sai Surya Teja, Advocate [OPUC] 9. TwoCCsto GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10. Two CCS to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 11. Two CD Copies. ssb u* -... VI- ■ \ V .. HIGH COURT DATED:23/07/2025 ORDER WP No. 16995 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS OF .i;' '