[2025:RJ-JP:27401] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4158/2025 1. Madhubala Wife Of Shri Mukesh Kumar Nagar D/o Shri Chandra Prakash, R/o Jorabarpura, Tehsil Pipalda, district Kota At Present R/o Plot No. 22, Green City-4 Vistar, Sarna Dungar, Jaipur. 2. Jeetu @ Jitendra Son Of Shri Radhey Shyam Nagar, R/o Jorabarpura, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. 3. Ramavtar Son Of Shri Radha Vallabh, R/o Jorabarpura, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Mukesh Nagar Son Of Brij Mohan, R/o Prem Nagar-II, Kota (Raj). At Present Gulab Vihar, Rampura Road, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Balvendra Singh Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 22/07/2025 The instant criminal misc. petition has been preferred under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing and setting aside the FIR No. 815/2023 registered with police station Muhana District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 380 and 120-B of IPC alongwith the stay application on the ground of compromise arrived at between the parties. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner No. 1 Madhubala is the wife of respondent No. 2 [2025:RJ-JP:27401] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-4158/2025] Mukesh, due to some matrimonial dispute this present FIR was lodged by the respondent No. 2. It is contended that respondent No. 2 and petitioners have entered into compromise and executed a written compromise which is annexed as annexure-4. Therefore, on the basis of compromise FIR lodged against the petitioner alongwith the subsequent proceedings arising out of the said FIR may be quashed and set aside. Respondent No. 2 Mukesh Nagar is present in person represented by his counsel Mr. Balvendra Singh Gurjar. It is contended by learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 that respondent No. 2 Mukesh and petitioners have amicably settled their dispute and executed a written compromise i.e. Annexure-4 which bear their signatures. It is also admitted that due to matrimonial dispute the said FIR was lodged against the petitioners. Parties have settled their dispute and respondent No. 2 and petitioner No. 1 have jointly moved an application under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act before the competent jurisdictional court and if the proceedings against the petitioners of the present case is quashed then respondent No. 2 has no objection. Heard and perused the material available on the record. Considering the facts that the parties have arrived at amicable settlement and executed a written compromise which bear signatures of both the parties. Respondent No. 2 is present in person before this court and admitted the execution of written compromise and also that he does not want to pursue with the present litigation. [2025:RJ-JP:27401] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-4158/2025] Therefore, considering the above facts, this court deems it appropriate to quash and set aside the FIR No. 815/2023 registered with police station Muhana District Jaipur City (South) alongwith all subsequent criminal proceedings. Accordingly, instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /298