Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24101 (KAR)

SRI BALATHRAJ R v. SMT KOUSALYA MOHANRAJ

MFA/6137/2019 · 2025-03-21

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:12005 MFA No. 6137 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6137 OF 2019 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI BALATHRAJ R S/O LATE V RAMAIAH @ RAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/A NO.33, R A LANE, EJIPURA, VIVEKNAGAR BANGALORE-560 047. 2. SRI. N. JAGADEESWARAN S/O B NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/A NO.3, 'D' STREET JAYARAJ NAGAR, ULSOOR BANGALORE-560 008. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHRAVAN S LOKRE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. KOUSALYA MOHANRAJ, W/O LATE V MOHANRAJ AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/A NO.240, 5TH SQUARE AUSTIN TOWN, BANGALORE-560 047. REPRESENTED BY HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI M. RAJENDRAN. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE,HUDSON CIRCLE, Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:12005 MFA No. 6137 of 2019 BANGALORE-560 002. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER (EAST), BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE,MAYO HALL BUILDING, RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025. 4. THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE,DOMLUR SUB-DIVISION, MAYO HALL, WARD NO.114 BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.S. NARAYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1, SMT. M C NAGASHREE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT.12.02.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.8607/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE X ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-26), ALLOWING IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1&2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants have filed a memo dated 21.03.2025, which reads as under: "The appellants in the above appeal submits that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to order the withdrawal of the above appeal as not pressed as the same may be dismissed as withdrawn and there is already a status quo in the suit which is at its fag end hence the above appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn in the above case, in the interest of justice and equity". - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:12005 MFA No. 6137 of 2019 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31