Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24094 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1727/2025 · 2025-04-03

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:47759 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1727 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Pravesh Yadav,Sadrul Islam Jafri,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- Agnivesh, Jadu Nandan Yadav,G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri N.I. Jafri, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Ram Pravesh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pranvesh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Jadu Nandan Yadav, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record. 3. This is the second anticipatory bail application filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 202 of 2023, under Sections 307, 323, 34, 325, 504, 506 of I.P.C., P.S.- Nagla Singhi, District- Firozabad. His first Anticipatory Bail Application u/s 438 Cr.P.C. No. 1976 of 2024 was dismissed as infructuous by this Court vide order dated 14.05.2024. 4. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 5. Learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C.. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall surrender before the court concerned within four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case. Order Date:- 4.4.2025 Siddhant (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad