THE ESTATE OFFICER AND CHIEF OFFICER v. P K CHANDRAPPA
WP/13341/2021 · 2025-01-06
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24093 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24093 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:48 WP No. 13341 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13341 OF 2021 (GM-PP) BETWEEN:
THE ESTATE OFFICER AND CHIEF OFFICER, HIRIYUR MUNICIPALITY, NOW THE COMMISSIONER, CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HIRIYUR - 577 598.
DIST: CHITRADURGA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HATTI SHIVALING NANJUNDAPPA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. P.K.CHANDRAPPA AGED 55 YEARS, S/O KARIYAPPA, ARTIST, AT GHANAPURI COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, T.T.ROAD, HIRIYUR-577 598.
DIST: CHITRADURGA.
2.
REVENUE OFFICER, HIRIYUR TOWN PANCHAYAT, HIRIYUR-577 598.
DIST: CHITRADURGA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUNDAR RAJ., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:48 WP No. 13341 of 2021
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
Sri.Sundar Raj., counsel for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. A perusal of the petition papers reveals that the order dated 08.09.2020 is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grounds and the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending for almost four years. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 4.1