Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24085 (KAR)

SRI ANIL KUMAR v. ICICI BANK LTD

WP/12806/2024 · 2025-04-21

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16409 WP No. 12806 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 12806 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI ANIL KUMAR, S/O LATE SRI C ANANTHA RAM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT G2, KANAKA ENCLAVE NO 19, POLICE STATION ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE - 560004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANDHYA U PRABHU.,ADVOCATE) AND: ICICI BANK LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER / MANAGER, 4/10, MYTHREE TOWER, BOMMANAHALLI, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560068. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JEEVAN KUMAR B S.,ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK TO RESTRUCTURE THE LOAN ACCOUNT BEARING NO. LBBNG00002422973 DTD. 04.08.2015 AS MENTIONED AT ANNX-B AND ACCOUNT BEARING NO. LBBNG00002422974 AS MENTIONED AT ANNX-C OF THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16409 WP No. 12806 of 2024 ORAL ORDER This Court on 24.03.2025 had passed the following order:- "Finally a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the petition would stand dismissed without hearing any submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner." 2. Even today, office objections are not complied with. 3. Therefore, the petition is dismissed for its non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 264