THE CARD ENTERPRISES v. PANJAB NATIONAL BANK HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED
WP/17104/2025 · 2025-07-09
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24083 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24083 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
•4 AF^HCOI 0340222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH- AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE- AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAQ.
WRIT PETITION NO: 17104 OF 2025 Between: The Card Enterprises, D.No.7/23/A, Pragathi Nagar, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh- 533509, Nageshwara Rao Talluri. Pedakakani, Rep. by its Proprietor Sri ...Petitioner^ AND
1. Panjab National Bank Housing Finance Limited, Regd. Office at Floor, Antriksh Bhavan, 22 Kasthurba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory.
2. M/s Panjab Housing Finance Limited, 4th Floor, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad- 500 034, Rep. by its Authorized Officer.
3. Panjab National Bank, Suryaraopet, Vijayawada Rep. by its Authorized Signatory. ...Respondents- Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly in the nature of
rv a Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in takirig possession of the secured assets through advocate commissioner vide CrI. MP. No. 480 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and contrary to the conditions of grant of the house fiat certificate. Consequently, direct the 3rd respondent in not take any coercive steps in respect of secured assets of the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent in not take any coercive steps in respect of secured assets of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.^ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SRINIVAS. Counsel for the Respondents: SRI JAVA PRAKASH MADASU The Court made the following order:
r * Bench Sr.No:-5 [3446] AP,^010340222025 ^IGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SMS WRIT PETITION NO: 17104 of 2025 ...Petitioner M/s. The Card Enterprises Vs. ...Respondents Panjab National Bank Housing Finance Limited and others ********** Mr. K. Srinivas Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Jaya Prakash Madasu Advocate for Respondents
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 10th July 2025 PC :
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that some material, averments and documents had not been placed on record and that he be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECftON OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri. K Srinivas Advocate [OPUC] —
2. One CC to Sri. Jaya Prakash Madasu Advocate [OPUC]
3. Three CD Copies gsc
HIGH COURT DATED; 10/07/2025 (
ORDER WP NO. 17104 OF 2025 ^ 1 9 JUL 2025 ]50, DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS