Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24079 (RAJ)

ABHISHEK SHARMA @ RAJA SHARMA S/O OMPRAKASH SHARMA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8846/2025 · 2025-08-27

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34077] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.8846/2025 Abhishek Sharma @ Raja Sharma S/o Omprakash Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. 2014, Pitliyon Ka Chauk, Near By L.M.B. Hotel, Jauhri Bazzar, Police Station Manak Chauk, District Jaipur. At Present Rental House No. 111/84, Vijaypath, Police Station Shiprapath, Jaipur South. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 27/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.958/2024, registered at Police Station Mansarover, District Jaipur City (South), for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner and the petitioner is falsely been implicated in the present case and in the FIR No.162/2025, registered at Police Station Mansarovar. The petitioner has remained in custody for three months and just after his release, the petitioner was again [2025:RJ-JP:34077] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8846/2025] falsely implicated under Section 303(2) of BNS. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 23.06.2025, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 17 cases are registered, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the charge-sheet has already been submitted, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 23.06.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioner- Abhishek Sharma @ Raja Sharma S/o Omprakash Sharma, in connection with FIR No.958/2024, registered at Police Station Mansarover, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is [2025:RJ-JP:34077] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8846/2025] directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-192