Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24078 (JHR)

VAARUN BAGARIA ALIAS VARUN BAGARIA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/593/2023 · 2025-02-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 593 of 2023 ------ 1. Vaarun Bagaria @ Varun Bagaria, aged about 33 years, s/o Pradeep Kumar Bagaria, r/o 54/10, 5C3, D.C. Dey Road, Tangra, P.O. & P.S.-Kolkata, Dist.-Kolkata, West Bengal- 700015 2. Pradeep Kumar Bagaria, aged about 62 years, s/o late Ram Chandra Bagaria, r/o 54/10, 5C3, D.C. Dey Road, Tangra, P.O. & P.S.-Kolkata, Dist.-Kolkata, West Bengal-700015 3. Saroj Kumar Bagaria @ Saroj Bagaria, aged about 69 years, s/o late Ram Chandra Bagaria, r/o 54/10, 5C3, D.C. Dey Road, Tangra, P.O. & P.S.-Kolkata, Dist.-Kolkata, West Bengal-700015 4. Raj Kumar Bagaria, aged about 65 years, s/o late Ram Chandra Bagaria, r/o C-101 Arvind Expansia, Mahadevapura Main Road, Oppo. Hindustan Petrol Bunk, Puttappa Industrial Layout, Mahadevapura, P.O. & P.S.- Bengaluru, Dist.-Bengaluru, Karnataka-560048 5. Shambhunath Sharma @ Sambhunath Sharma @ Shambhu Sharma, aged about 57 years, s/o late Ram Chandra Sharma, r/o Marwari Mahalla, P.O. & P.S.-Pachamba, Dist.-Giridih, Jharkhand -815301 … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Chandan Kumar Gupta, aged about 41 years, s/o Suresh Prasad Gupta, r/o Village Near Pachamba, Post Office, High School Road, P.O. & P.S.-Pachamba, Dist.-Giridih, Jharkhand-815301 … Respondents ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Advocate : Mr. Gaurang Jajodia, Advocate For the State : Mr. Lav Kr. Tiwari, AC to AAG V For the Respondents : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate ------ Order No.08 Dated- 19.02.2025 Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a criminal miscellaneous petition. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The petitioners are permitted to substitute the certified copy of the documents filed in this writ petition with its photocopy. In view of the withdrawal of this writ petition, the I.A. No.1710 of 2025 is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/