Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24077 (RAJ)

BULARAM v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENSE

CW/13815/2018 · 2025-02-06

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5416] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13815/2018 Bularam S/o Shri Basantaram Gurjar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Pahari, District Alwar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Defense, New Delhi 2. Senior Registrar And O.C Ts Commandant Military Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Bring Commandant, Military Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Saini for Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manjeet Kaur Ms. Disha Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 06/02/2025 1. Counsel for respondent-Railway submits that the contract period of Canteen Stall allotted to the petitioner was of 11 months and that period has expired on 28.02.2019, thereafter, petitioner has vacated the Stall and handed over the keys to the respondents, but due to pendency of instant writ petition and the operation of interim order dated 04.07.2018, respondents are not able to re-allot the Canteen Stall. 2. Counsel for petitioner, having instructions from the petitioner, does not dispute the contention of counsel for respondents and states that with afflux of time, the prayer made in the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissing as rendered infructuous. [2025:RJ-JP:5416] (2 of 2) [CW-13815/2018] 4. The stay order dated 04.07.2018 stands vacated. 5. Respondents are at liberty to re-allot the Stall in question, afresh. 6. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /73