Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24077 (AP)

M.M.F. Rahaman, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22501/2020 · 2025-08-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010339792020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22501/2020 Between: 1. M.M.F. RAHAMAN,, FATHER NAME LATE MD. SAHAB R/O. H.NO.3- 48/7, DURGA NAGAR, PENDURTHI MANDAL, PULAGALIPALEM, VISAKHAPATHAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TOWN POLICE STATION, NARSAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIRCLE OFFICE, NARSAPURAM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. MOHAMMAD HASEENA, R/O. 13TH WARD, NARSAPURAM TOWN, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in not initiating appropriate action against 4th Respondent, her family members and henchmen in pursuance to Petitioners various complaints dt. 10-06-2020 addressed to the 3rd Respondent herein and 25-11-2019, 19-08- 2 2020, 24-08-2020 addressed to the 2nd Respondent herein as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, malafide, irrational and to consequently direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 herein to forthwith initiate appropraite action against Respondent No.4, her family members and henchmen as required under law as per Petitioners complaints dt. 10-06-2020 addressed to the 3rd Respondent herein and 25-11-2019, 19-08-2020, 24-08-2020 addressed to the 2nd Respondent herein in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 herein to forthwith initiate appropriate action against Respondent No.4, her family members and henchmen as required under law as per Petitioner’s complaints dt. 10-06-2020 addressed to the 3rd Respondent herein and 25-11-2019, 19-08-2020, 24-08-2020 addressed to the 2nd Respondent herein in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALLAGALI GOPALARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22501 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in not initiating appropriate action against 4th Respondent, her family members and henchmen in pursuance to Petitioners various complaints dt.10-06-2020 addressed to the 3rd Respondent herein and 25-11-2019, 19-08-2020, 24-08-2020 addressed to the 2nd Respondent herein as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, malafide, irrational and to consequently direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 herein to forthwith initiate appropriate action against Respondent No.4, her family members and henchmen as required under law as per Petitioners’ complaints dt.10-06-2020 addressed to the 3rd Respondent herein and 25-11-2019, 19-08- 2020, 24-08-2020 addressed to the 2nd Respondent herein in the interest of justice and pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Challagali Gopalaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 06.08.2025 UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22501 of 2020 Dated.06.08.2025 UPS 150