Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24074 (AP)

Bukya Sai Kumar Naik v. The State of Andra Pradesh

CRLP/7030/2025 · 2025-07-09

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010339642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7030 OF 2025 Between: 1. Bukya Sai Kumar Naik, S/o. B.Shankar Naik, Aged 24 years, Occ: M.B.B.S Student, R/o. D.No.16-20A, Kokkanti Cross, Tanakal Mandal, Satya Sai District, Earlier Ananthapuramu District. 2. Bukya Ramya @ Ramya Bai, D/o. B.Shankar Naik, Aged 25 years Occ; Student, R/o. D.No.16-20A, Kokkanti Cross, Tanakal Mandal Satya Sai District, Earlier Ananthapuramu District. (Accused No.2 ) ...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, High Court Buildings at Nelapadu, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Raga Bhagyalakshmi Bhagyamma, W/o. Ramachandra, Aged 38 years, R/o.Kokkanti Cross, Tanakal Mandal, Satya Sai District (earlier Ananthapuramu District). ...Respondents/Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.c and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2 in FIR.No.36 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025 on the file of Tanakal Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with certified copy of FIR No. 36 of 2025 dated 28/03/2025 on the file of Tanakal Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District before this Hon’ble Court. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including arrest and appearance of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 in FIR.No.36 of 2025 dated 28.03.2025 on the file of Tanakal Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Doddaka Harsha Vardhan Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following order: APHC010339642025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7030/2025 [3457] Between: 1.BUKYA SAI KUMAR NAIK, S/0. B.SHANKAR NAIK AGED 24 YEARS OCC M.B.B.S STUDENT, R/0. D.NO.16-20A, KOKKANTI CROSs’ TANAKAL MANDAL, SATYA SAI DISTRICT, EARLIER ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2.BUKYA RAMYA @ RAMYA BAI, D/0. B.SHANKAR NAIK YEARS, TANAKAL - aged 25 OCC STUDENT^ R/0. D.NO.16-20A, KOKKANTI CROSS, EARLIER MANDAL, SATYA SAI DISTRICT ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. (ACCUSED N0.2 ) ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, AMARAVATI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HIGH COURT BUILDINGS AT NELAPADU, 2.RAGA BHAGYALAKSHMI BHAGYAMMA, W/0. RAMACHANDRA AGED 38 YEARS, R/0. KOKKANTI CROSS, TANAKAL MANDAL SATYA SAI DISTRICT (EARLIER ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT). ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused{S): 1. DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 ORDER:- The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are students and falsely implicated in Crime No.36 of 2025, on the file of Tanakal Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District. nd petitioner has earlier filed Crime No.33 of 2025 against the 2"'^ respondent and as a counterblast Crime No.36 of 2025 was registered by the 2'"'^ respondent against the petitioners. It is submitted that the 2 2. Considering the submission that the present case is a counterblast to the complaint filed by the 2"^ petitioner and also considering the fact that petitioners are students, pursuing M.B.B.S. at Ananthapuramu, the Station House Officer, Tanakal Police Station, Sri Sathya Sai District is directed to 3. complete the investigation, without taking any coercive steps against the petitioners as expeditiously as possible. However, it is made clear that this order would not preclude the investigating officer for filing charge sheet/final report into the Court. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed off. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAF! ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate: Kadiri, Prakasam District. 2. The Station House Officer, Tanakal Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District. 3. One CC to Sri Doddaka Harsha Vardhan Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC s to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies SAM vna HIGH COURT \ DATED:10/07/2025 ORDER CRLPNO. 7030 OF 2025 1 *» JUL 2025 )g DISPOSING OF THE CRLP