Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010242312025 2025:GAU-AS:15436 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2594/2025 JIARUL ISLAM AND 3 ORS. S/O- SHOMESH ALI, VILL.-RAKHASINI PAHAR P.O.- RAKHYASINI, P.S.- MORNOI, DIST.- GOALPARA, ASSAM 2: IBRAHIM ALI ALIAS IBRAHIM S/O- HUSSAIN ALI VILL.-DHARMAPUR P.O.- DHARMAPUR P.S.- ALUPOTI DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM. 3: ESOP ALI ALIAS EASHAB ALI S/O- SOBAHAN ALI VILL.-RAKHASINI PAHAR P.O.- RAKHYASINI P.S.- MORNOI DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM. 4: NASIR HUSSAIN S/O- NOUSHAD ALI VILL.-RAKHASINI PAHAR P.O.AND P.S. AND DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M I HUSSAIN, MR. S M RAHMAN,R KHA,N. UDDIN,MS. P AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 14.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. N.I. Khan, learned for the petitioners and also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P for the State. 2. This application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 have been filed by the petitioners, namely, 1. Jiarul Islam, 2. Ibrahim Ali @ Ibrahim, 3. Esop Ali @ Eashab Ali, 4. Nasir Hussain who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bongaigaon P.S. Case No. 252/2025 under Sections 331(4)/305(a)/112(2) of BNS,2023. 3. One person namely Bhaskar Jyoti Singha, S/O Lt. Majedra Kumar Singha lodged an FIR with the Bongaigaon Police Station alleging inter-alia that on 28- 09-2025 at around approx 1:40 AM, some unknown miscreants broke into his shop namely M/s M.S. Infotech, located at Main Road Near AGP Office Bongaigaon Assam 783380 and had stolen Mobile Phones 4,13,798.64/- (Including GST), Television 15450/-(Including GST), Laptop 79,375/-(Including GST), Accessories 5090/-(Including GST), Cash Rs. 5000 approx. Total approximate value of stolen goods is Rs.5,18,713.64/- After receiving the FIR the Officer-in-Charge of Bongaigaon Police Station registered the FIR vide Bongaigaon P.S. case No. 252/2025 under section 31(4)/305(a)/112(2) of BNS and started investigation. Page No.# 3/3 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have spent 38 days behind custody and items have also been recovered and hence prayer for bail may be considered. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that they are not the main accused in the case and they are ready to co-operate with the investigation. 6. On the other hand, learned Addl. P.P., upon perusal of the case diary submits that the present petitioners are the main perpetrators of the crime along with the other co-accused persons which has been revealed in the investigation. 7. Having regard to the above, the prayer for pre-arrest bail stands rejected and petition stands dismissed. 8. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant