Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24071 (RAJ)

MR NEERAJ KHERA S/O SHRI GIAN CHAND v. CHAIRMAN REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY

CW/11725/2020 · 2025-02-13

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6424] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11725/2020 1. Mr Neeraj Khera S/o Shri Gian Chand, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 02A, Second Floor, H-4, Street, Vatika India Next, Sector - 82, Gurugram, Haryana-122004 2. Mr. Satinder Singh Mann S/o Late Narinder Singh Manni, Aged About 55 Years, R/o House No. 915, Sector 17B, Gurgaon, Haryana 3. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singla S/o Shri Joginder Pal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Flat 502, Tower 3D, Orris Aster Court, Sector -85, Gurgaon 4. Mr. Dharmraj Singh Chauhan S/o Mr. Sudarshan Singh, Aged About 61 Years, R/o 5Ko34, Ridgewood Estate, Dlf Phase-4, Gurgaon-09 5. Mr. Vishal Gupta S/o Mr. Jagdish Chandra Gupta, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Flat No. 204, The New Shivani Cghs, Plot-56, Gurgaon 6. Mrs. Seema Srivastava W/o Mr. Harish Srivastava, Aged About 51 Years, R/o House No. Gh-Ii/92-B, Ankur Apartments, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi - 110063 7. Mrs. Shakuntla Sahu W/o Late Col. Narender Sahu, Aged About 72 Years, R/o House No. K-46, South City-1, Gurgaon (Hr) 8. Yuzvendra Singh Chahal S/o Shri K.k. Chahal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 182/2, Rambir Singh Colony, Rly Road, Jind Junction, Jind-126102 Haryana ----Petitioners Versus 1. Chairman Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Jaipur 2. Mvl Limited, Having Its Registered Office At 1201 B, 12Th Floor, Hemkunt Chamber, 89, Nehru Place, New Delhi 110019 3. Mr. Prem Adip Rishi, R/o F-79/18, Sainik Farm, South Delhi - 110062 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin K. Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pallavi Mehta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 13/02/2025 1. Matter has come up on an application (IA No.1/2025) filed by petitioners, seeking withdrawal of the present writ petition in [2025:RJ-JP:6424] (2 of 2) [CW-11725/2020] order to approach before the RERA Appellate Tribunal against the impugned order dated 11.05.2020. 2. It has inter alia been pleaded in the application that at the time of institution of the present writ petition, the RERA Appellate Tribunal was not functioning, but now the same is in function, therefore, petitioners do not want to press this writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to approach before the RERA Appellate Tribunal. 3. In such view of the matter, application (IA No.1/2025) is allowed and the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. 4. Since the writ petition was filed within the statutory period of limitation for filing appeal against the order dated 11.05.2020, hence it is hereby observed that in case appeal is filed by petitioner within a period of 30 days' from today, it is expected that the RERA Appellate Tribunal shall consider the appeal on merits, condoning the period during which the writ petition before this Court remained pending, by applying the provision of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/51