COCP-6195 IN THE HI 111 Dinesh Kum Vivek Aggar CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of CWP-17281 another’, representatio accordance w 2. submits that speaking ord moved by th case of the p Policy of th joined at new 3. Court by lea thereof, has b 6195-2025 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o h Kumar Versus Aggarwal M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Manoj Makkar, Advocate f Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of Writ Court order dated 01.07.20 17281-2025, titled as ‘Dinesh Kuma ’, whereby the respondents wer entation moved by the petitioner by ance with law, within a period of 04 w At the very outset, learned cou ts that in compliance of the order date ng order dated 05.08.2025 has been p by the petitioner has been decided; f the petitioner for re-transfer has bee of the respondent-State. Moreover at new place of posting. Copy of the Speaking Order dat by learned counsel for the responden f, has been supplied to learned counsel ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-6195-2025 Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA cate for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging 1.07.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed in Kumar vs. State of Haryana and s were directed to decide the er by passing a speaking order, in f 04 weeks. ed counsel for the respondent-State r dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P-1), been passed and the representation and it has been decided that the as been rejected as per the Transfer reover, the petitioner has already der dated 05.08.2025 handed over in ondent is taken on record. A copy ounsel for the petitioner. ging d in and the r, in tate 1), tion t the sfer ady er in opy RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.16 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-6195 4. survives in accordingly. 5. 6. required to b of. 7. 8. 15.01.2026 rishu 6195-2025 -2- Learned counsel for the petition es in the present petition and the ingly. Heard. In view of the facts noted a ed to be passed in the present petition, Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable etitioner, thus, submits that nothing d the same may be disposed of, oted above, no further orders are tition, and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No hing are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.01.16 10:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.