2025:JHHC:12768 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5379 of 2024 1. Abhimanyu Kumar Singh, S/o Sudhir Singh, R/o village Ichak, POP Gangpur, PS Gidhour, District Chatra 2. Bajrang Kumar Singh, S/o late Banwari Singh, R/o village Ichak, PO: Gangpur, PS Gidhour, District Chatra. ….. Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 5662 of 2024 1. Basant Kumar Singh, S/o late Gauri Singh 2. Ramchandra Singh, S/o late Gauri Singh 3. Nitesh Kumar Singh @ Nitesh Singh, S/o Awadh Singh @ Subodh Kumar Singh @ Subodh Singh 4. Subodh Kumar Singh @ Subodh Singh, S/o Awadh Singh 5. Sanni Kumar Singh, S/o Basant Kumar Singh Sl. Nos. 1 to 5 all are R/o village Ichak, PO: Gangapur, PS Gidhour, District Chatra, Jharkhand 6. Sangita Pathak, W/o Vinod Kumar Pathak, r/o village and PO: Gangapur, PS Gidhour, District Chatra, Jharkhand. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushant Kumar Sinha, Advocate; Mr. Anurag Kahsyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, APP; Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, APP For the Informant : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Gupta, Advocate ----- 02/29.04.2025: These anticipatory bail applications have been filed by the petitioners praying for grant of anticipatory bail in terms of sections 482 and 484 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, as the petitioners have been allegedly implicated in Gidhour PS case no. 38 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 147,148,149,341,323,379,385 and 436 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned J.M.-1st class, Chatra. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and the learned counsel for the State appearing in both the cases. 3. The learned APP and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 2025:JHHC:12768 4. As per allegations, these petitioners and others have demanded levy and thereafter burnt the machineries. The petitioners are name in the FIR 5. There is no specific allegation against these petitioners but there is an allegation that these petitioners along with others have committed the offence as aforesaid. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I do not find this case fit for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Hence, both the above-noted anticipatory bail applications are dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J. ) KNR/