Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24063 (KAR)

SRI JAGANNATHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY

WP/13311/2024 · 2025-03-03

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8989 WP No. 13311 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 13311 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI JAGANNATHA S/O LATE DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RA/T MADHINAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE BETHAMANGALA HOBLI KGF TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 116 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H. SURESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISISONER KOLAR TOWN KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 563 101 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISIOSNER KOLR TOWN KOLAR TALUK AND DSITRICT 563101 Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8989 WP No. 13311 of 2024 4. THE TAHSIDLAR KGF TALUK OFFICE KGF KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 114 5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR BEHTMANGALA CIRCLE AND HOBLI KGF TALUK AND KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 116 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO 5 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 28.08.2019, 21.06.2022 AND 28.01.2024 AS PER ANNX-H, J, K AND L RESPECTIVELY AND THEREBY ISSUE COMPUTERIZED KATHA AND RTC BY INCORPORATING THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this writ petition is for issuance of a direction to the respondent Nos.2 to 5 to consider the representation dated 28.08.2019, 21.06.2022, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8989 WP No. 13311 of 2024 28.01.2024, the copies of which are produced at Annexure – H, J, K and L respectively. 2. By these representations, the petitioner is requesting for registration of his name as a khatedar on the premise that land that has been granted to him under Annexure – A. 3. In the light of the fact that the petitioner claim that there is a grant made in his favour, it would be appropriate to direct respondent No.4 to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that nothing mentioned in this order shall be construed as an opinion rendered on the merits of the claim of the petitioner and the Tahsildar shall examine whether the petitioner is granted with a land and whether the khata is liable to be registered in his name on that behalf. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:8989 WP No. 13311 of 2024 5. The Tahsildar is granted three months time to undertake and complete the exercise. 6. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 7. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4