Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24054 (JHR)

VIKASH SAO ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2494/2025 · 2025-09-25

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30134 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2494 of 2025 Vikash Sao @ Vikash Kumar, aged about 22 years, son of Sri Surendra Prasad, resident of Village Siroikhurd, P.O. and P.S. Ranka, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Pandey, Adv. Order No.05/Dated- 25.09.2025 1. It appears from the office report dated 23.09.2025 that the case was listed on 18th September, 2025 but due to typographical error, the date of order No.4 has been wrongly typed as “18th August, 2025” in place of “18th September, 2025”. 2. Accordingly, the order No.4 is modified to the extent that the date of order No.4 shall be read as “18th September, 2025” in place of “18th August, 2025”. 3. Let the certified copy of this order shall always be issued along with the order dated 18th August, 2025. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed with a prayer for restoration of B.A. No.6320 of 2025 to its original file which was stood dismissed for default by this Court vide order dated 18.07.2025. 6. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter was listed on 18.07.2025 before this Court and due to suffering from high fever, he could not appear in the matter but he has informed the same to any other counsel to take adjournment in this case but unfortunately, when the case was called out, he was engaged in another Court due to which the matter was unattended and the case was dismissed for default. It is further submitted that the laches on part of the petitioner was neither deliberate nor intentional. Petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the B.A. 2025:JHHC:30134 Page | 2 No.6320 of 2025 and unless B.A. No.6320 of 2025 is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that B.A. No.6320 of 2025 may be restored to its original file. 7. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and for the ends of justice, B.A. No.6320 of 2025 is restored to its original file. 8. Registry is directed to list B.A. No.6320 of 2025 before the concerned Bench. 9. This criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed accordingly. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Sachin