Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010265822025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3888/2025 ROHIT DUTTA ALIAS BHAI AND ANR S/O LATE RATNESWAR DUTTA 2: NABA DUTTA ALIAS MOON ALIAS NABA KANTA DUTTA S/O LATE RATNESWAR DUTTA BOTH ARE R/O BORBIL BALIGAON P.S. PANIGAON DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B CHOWDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 03.12.2025 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. B. Choudhury for the petitioners namely, (i) Rohit Dutta @Bhai, and (ii) Naba Dutta who have filed his application under section Page No.# 2/3 483 of the BNSS, 2023 with prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Case No. 104(NL)/2025. It is submitted that the petitioners are facing trial in connection with a case registered under Sections 302/34 of the IPC pending before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Lakhimpur. 2. The petitioners were on bail which is clearly reflected in the order dated 15.07.2025, more particularly Annexure-3 of the petition. After commitment, the case was fixed for appearance and trial. On the next date, the petitioners through their engaged counsel prayed for adjournment and the next date was fixed on 18.08.2025. Thereafter, the petitioners again prayed for adjournment and the next date was fixed on 15.09.2025 i.e., Annexure-6. On 15.09.2025, the Court passed an order after disposing the petition that as they could not produce the original documents, to produce the original documents. Finally, vide order dated 17.11.2025, when the petitioners surrendered before the Court, they were forwarded to custody. 3. It is submitted that the petitioners were already on bail and they are willing to co-operate with trial. 4. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Ms. N. Das for the respondent State who has raised serious objection against the conduct of the petitioners. 5. After considering the submissions, it appears that the petitioners may be granted bail. The petitioners are local residents and they are willing to abide by any stringent bail conditions if imposed upon them. 6. The petitioners are enlarged on bail of Rs. 50,000/- with a suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court who may impose conditions to secure their attendance. 7. In terms of the above observation, this application stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant