1 APHC010339682020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22498/2020 Between: 1. KONDAKAMARLA CHALAPATHI,, S/O. K. SEEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O CHINTHALAVARIPALLE, H/O. DIGUVAPALLE VILLAGE, THAMBALLAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. KONDAKAMARLA RAMACHANDRA,, S/O. K. SEEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O CHINTHALAVARIPALLE, H/O. DIGUVAPALLE VILLAGE, THAMBALLAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THAMBALLAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. BOMMINENI CHALAPATHY, S/O B. PEDDA GANGULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. CHINTHALAVARIPALLE, H/O. DIGUVAPALLE VILLAGE, THAMBALLAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. BOMMINENI SIVANNA, B. PEDDA GANGULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. CHINTHALAVARIPALLE, H/O. DIGUVAPALLE VILLAGE, THAMBALLAPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ Order or direction declaring the action of 3rd Respondent herein in interfering with the civil disputes pending between the Petitioners and the 4th and 5th Respondents herein as arbitrary illegal unconstitutional without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent herein to conduct a detailed enquiry on the representation of the Petitioners dated 16.11.2020 and take necessary action against the 3rd Respondent herein” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 02.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.22498 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr