Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24045 (JHR)

GYAN SINGH v. MRS. SAPNA DEVI

FA/128/2013 · 2025-04-22

Rajesh Kumar, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:11890-DB) Page | 1 F.A No.128 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A No.128 of 2013 ---- Gyan Singh, Son of Sri Ram Keshwar Singh, resident of Village- Sarugaru, P.O. Bahimar, P.S. Katkamsandi, District-Hazarbagh …. …. Appellant -Versus- Mrs. Sapna Devi, wife of Gyan Singh and daughter of Sri Ram Naresh Singh, resident of Village-Barwan, P.O. Ichak, P.S Ichak, District- Hazaribagh, at present residing at Quarter No.1169, Sector-12/D Bokaro Steel City, P.O., P.S.-Bokaro, District-Bokaro …. …. Respondent ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Senior Advocate : Mr. Lalan Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : None ---- Order No.15/Dated: 22nd April, 2025 1. Mr. Anand Kumar Viz, learned counsel, at the outset, has submitted that he has not filed vakalatnama but even then his name is being reflected in the daily cause-list. 2. Office to verify. 3. Notices have been issued upon the respondent as it appears from the office note dated 13.04.2015 that notice has been validly served, but nobody appears on behalf of the respondent-wife. 4. The case has been admitted vide order dated 13.04.2015 and as such, the matter is being heard on merits. 5. After some argument, Mr. A.K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant assisted by learned counsel, Mr. Lalan (2025:JHHC:11890-DB) Page | 2 F.A No.128 of 2013 Kumar Singh, has sought leave of this Court to withdraw present appeal with a liberty to file an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 6. Consider the aforesaid submissions, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the appellant to make an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 7. Consequently, the appeal is disposed of. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Rajesh Kumar, J.) A.Mohanty/Raja Uploaded