APHC010340572002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 24016/2002 Between: 1. RAJAHMUNDRY CITY WHOLESALE AND RETAIL CLOTH SHOPS NATIONAL, NATIONAL WORKERS UNION, A UNION AFFILIATED TO INTUC,REP. BY ITS CITY INTUC PRESIDENT VASAM SETTI GANGADHARA RAO, (REGD.NO.2247), OPP: BHAVANA RUSHI TEMPLE, ...PETITIONER AND 1. COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR HYDERABAD, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMBEDKAR BHAVAN, CHIKKADPALLY, HYDERABAD. 2. DY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, ZONE-2, ASHOKNAGAR, ELURU, 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, CIRCLE-2, GANDHIPURAM, RAJAHMUNDRY. 4. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, CIRCLE - 2, GANDHIPURAM, RAJAHMUNDRY. 5. BOMMANA NARAYANA SONS, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SMT.BD SHASHIKALA, KANCHI KAMAKSHI SILK HOUSE AND BOMMANA READYMADE FASHIONS, JETTY PLAZA, FORT GATE, 6. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAHMUNDRY. 7. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, RAJAHMUNDRY. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in thenature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent 1 to 3 to entertain the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner on behalf of the 5th Respondent's Employees by taking into account the colourable exercise of closure and reopening of the business in the name of another family member under the same generic famil name of Bommana and continuing business in the name of another family member in the same premises of the cloth business and direct the respondents to pass such orders on the basis of the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 30138 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 5th Respondent not to close the business and open another cloth business in the same premises by and under the name of family members of the 5th Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V KRISHNA RAYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. GP FOR LABOUR 3. The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.07.2025 and 31.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS