[2025:RJ-JP:28295] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4101/2025 Yakub Ali Son Of Subrati, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Piplai, Police Station Bamanwas, Sawai Madhopur. (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Sadab Ali Son Of Shri Mahboob Ali, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Sadar Bazar, Sawai Madhopur, Police Station Kotwali, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Khandelwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 28/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that limited role of the petitioner in the alleged incident is that he had purchased illegal mobiles which were stolen by another person. It is further submitted that qua the petitioner, the said mobile phone is already recovered. It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that the factual report suggests that in the present crime, the petitioner is involved however, after conclusion of the investigation, role of the petitioner will be surfaced, as to whether he is innocent or otherwise. [2025:RJ-JP:28295] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4101/2025] At this juncture, learned counsel has submitted that an opportunity be given to the petitioner to put-forth a representation before the Investigating Officer. Heard. This Court in light of the ratio encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], and taking note of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, directs the Investigating Officer to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, strictly in accordance with law. Investigating Officer is at liberty to draw conclusion as per his wisdom and taking note of the material facts of the matter in hand. In light of the above terms, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /48