- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25193 WP No. 13284 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 13284 OF 2021 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. KARI YALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, S/O LATE NANJAPPA, R/AT NOSENOOR GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, 560105 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAMA BHAT O.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU 560030 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU 560002 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT 562106 4. M NANJAREDDY AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25193 WP No. 13284 of 2021 S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA @ MALLAPPA, R/AT NOSENOOR GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, 560105 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 SRI H.C. NATARAJ , ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ORDER DTD 22.12.2020 PASSED IN REVISION PETITION NO.263/2011-2012 ON THE FILE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU/RESPONDENT NO.1, VIDE ANNX-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 22.12.2020 passed in Revision Petition No.263/2011-2012 by the respondent No.1 - Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District, (Annexure-A). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. Having taken note of the findings recorded by the respondent No.1 (Annexure-A) would indicate that, the respondent No.1 has set aside the order dated 14.06.2011 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25193 WP No. 13284 of 2021 passed in RRT.CR(A) 274/2011-12 by the respondent No.2. It is also forthcoming from the findings recorded by the Respondent-Authorities that OS No.185/2010 (Annexure-G) has been filed by the petitioner herein challenging the sale deed dated 23.04.1958. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the said suit has been withdrawn, and thereafter, OS No.654/2023 has been filed before the competent Civil Court seeking declaration in respect of the subject land. Hence, the rights of the parties are yet to be crystallized in the pending suit. 4. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. The parties are directed to await the judgment and decree that may be passed by the Civil Court SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE BKM