HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8544/2024 Manni Bai S/o Shivji, R/o Madorajpura, P.s. K Patan, Dist. Bundi. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 02/01/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this miscellaneous bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S as she is having apprehension of her arrest in connection with F.I.R. No. 40/2024, registered at Police Station Keshorai Patan, District Bundi for offences under Sections 143, 341 & 323 of IPC. Presently, investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 & 34 of IPC. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a female and all the injuries sustained to the injured person have been found simple in nature. He further submits that (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8544/2024] there are no criminal antecedents of petitioner. He further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter as the matter has already settled between the parties. He thus, prays that instant bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. may kindly be allowed. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is duly named in the FIR and she also actively participated in the commission of crime. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and especially the fact that cross cases have been registered between the parties; petitioner is a female and no specific allegation is appearing against the petitioner in the FIR; absence of criminal antecedents, but without commenting on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the anticipatory bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Keshorai Patan, District Bundi in F.I.R. No. 40/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to her satisfaction on the following conditions :- (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8544/2024] (i). that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J ANAND TANWAR /114