Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010190742021 2025:GAU-AS:15960 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6631/2021 ROBIJYOTI ROY S/O LATE CHITTA RAJAN ROY, R/O NILMONI ROAD, HOUSE NO. 77, HOLDING NO. 24 WARD NO. 10, KARIMGANJ 788710, DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM. VERSUS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 8 ORS ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD., BIJULEE BHAVAN, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI 781001 2:THE ASSAM ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CODE AND RELATED MATTERS) REGULATIONS 2004 (FIRST AMENDMENT) 2007 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON 3:THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER KARIMGANJ ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD. CAR DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 4:SUJATA ROY W/O LATE CHITTA RANJAN ROY R/O NILMONI ROAD HOUSE NO. 77 HOLDING NO. 24 WARD NO. 10 KARIMGANJ 788710 Page No.# 2/3 DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 5:CHINMOY KANTI ROY S/O LATE CHITTA RANJAN ROY R/O GAURANGA BHAWAN SETTLEMENT KALIBARI ROAD KARIMGANJ 788712 ASSAM. 6:ASHOK BIJOY ROY S/O LATE CHITTA RANJAN ROY R/O NILMONI ROAD HOUSE NO. 77 HOLDING NO. 24 WARD NO. 10 KARIMGANJ 788710 DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 7:BITHIKA ROY D/O LATE CHITTA RANJAN ROY W/O PRASANTA ROY R/O DAS COLONY MAZUMDAR LANE SILCHAR 788005 DIST. CACHAR ASSAM. 8:AJIT KR. ROY S/O LATE CHITTA RANJAN ROY R/O NILMONI ROAD HOUSE NO. 77 HOLDING NO. 24 WARD NO. 10 KARIMGANJ 788710 DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 9:BENUDHAR ROY S/O LATE CHITTA RANJAN ROY R/O NILMONI ROAD HOUSE NO. 77 HOLDIG NO. 24 WARD NO. 10 KARIMGANJ 788710 Page No.# 3/3 DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. Chakraborty, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. P. Pathak, SC, APDCL BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 24.11.2025 Heard Mr. D. Chakraborty, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. K. P. Pathak, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent APDCL. 2. Mr. D. Chakraborty, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that in view of the electricity connection being provided to the Petitioner, the cause of action no longer survives. He therefore submits that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant