Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24005 (GAU)

KUMAR SANJIT KRISHNA v. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE GUWAHATI ZONAL OFFICE-I

I.A.(Crl.)/1253/2025 · 2025-11-23

Michael Zothankhuma, Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010258472025 2025:GAU- AS:15907-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1253/2025 KUMAR SANJIT KRISHNA SON OF LATE UMA CHARAN BANIA, UMA TIRTHA HOUSE NO 51 KACHARI BASTI ULUBARI, PALTAN BAZAR, 781007 DISTRICT KAMRUP (M) ASSAM VERSUS ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE GUWAHATI ZONAL OFFICE-I GOVT. OF INDIA, GUWAHATI ZONE 1 MANIK TOWER, 6TH FLOOR, CHRISTIAN BASTI, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI 781005, THROUGH SHRI SHEETI KANTHA DAS, DEPUTY DIRECTOR. 2:SHRI SHEETI KANTHA DAS OFFICER IN CHARGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR GOVT. OF INDIA GUWAHATI ZONE 1 MANIK TOWER 6TH FLOOR CHRISTIAN BASTI G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI 781005 THROUGH SHRI SHEETI KANTHA DAS DEPUTY DIRECTOR Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. P AGARWAL, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ED, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 KUMAR SANJIT KRISHNA SON OF LATE UMA CHARAN BANIA UMA TIRTHA HOUSE NO 51 KACHARI BASTI ULUBARI PALTAN BAZAR DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR GOVT OF INDIA GUWAHATI ZONE 1 MANIK TOWER 6TH FLOOR CHRISTAN BASTI GS ROAD GUWAHATI THROUGH SHRI SHEETI KANTHA DAS DEPUTY DIRECTOR 2:SHRI SHEETI KANTHA DAS OFFICER IN CHARGE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENGORCEMENT GOVT OF INDIA GUWAHATI ZONE 1 MANIK TOWER 6TH FLOOR CHRISTAN BASTI GS ROAD GUWAHATI ------------ Advocate for : Adrita Bhuyan Advocate for : appearing for THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 24-11-2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Dr. P. Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant who submits that there is a delay of 9 (nine) days in re-filing the appeal, though the appeal had been filed on time. Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel for the respondents submits that she has no objection to the delay being condoned. In view of the above reasons, the delay of 9 (nine) days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. Registry is to list the connected appeal on 08.12.2025. The interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant