HIND TERMINALS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
W.P.(C)/12142/2019 · 2025-01-31
Jyoti Singh
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24005 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24005 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 12142/2019
$~A-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12142/2019
HIND TERMINALS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Piyush Sharma, Mr. Rahul Khosla, Ms. Shweta, Mr. Sarang Rastogi, Mr. Pankaj Prakash and Mr. Ramit Jain, Advocates. versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Himanshu Singh and Ms. Priya Khurana, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Manuj Gautam, Mr. Nitish Pande, Mr. Sarthak Udaipuria, Mr. Nikhil Kumar, Mr. Amish Kumar and Mr. Sunhita Pandey, Advocates for Review Petitioners. CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R %
19.09.2025 CM APPL. 48586/2025
1. This application is filed on behalf of the Review Petitioners seeking condonation of delay of 10 days in filing the review petition. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed condoning the delay of 10 days in filing the review petition. 3. Application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 48587/2025
4. This application is filed on behalf of the Review Petitioners seeking condonation of delay of 42 days in re-filing the present review petition. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:19:45
W.P.(C) 12142/2019
5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed condoning the delay of 42 days in re-filing the present review petition. 6. Application stands disposed of. REVIEW PET. 423/2025 and CM APPL. 48588/2025
7. By way of this review petition, Respondents No.1 and 2/Review Petitioners seek review of judgment dated 31.01.2025. Plain reading of the review petition reflects that Review Petitioners in fact call upon this Court to re-visit the interpretation given to the 2015 PFT Policy, which is outside the scope of jurisdiction of the Court in a review petition. It needs no reiteration that review can only be sought if there is an error apparent on the face of the record of an order/judgment, which is not the case here. 8. The review petition is accordingly dismissed along with pending application. JYOTI SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 19, 2025/YA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2025 at 12:19:45