Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24004 (CHH)

ADHAR DAS MANIKPURI v. SMT. BACHAN MANIKPURI

CRR/520/2021 · 2025-07-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32632 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 520 of 2021 Adhar Das Manikpuri S/o Jagdev Das, Aged About 50 Years (Mintioned As 48 Years In The Impugned Order), Caste Panika, Village Pondi, Tehsil And Police Station Pali, District Korba, Chhattisgarh, Pin 495449. ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Bachan Manikpuri W/o Adhar Das Manikpuri, Aged About 43 Years (Mintioned As 41 In The Impugned Order), Caste Panika, R/o Village Pondi, Tehsil And Police Station Pali, Currently Residing At Pali, Tehsil And Police Station Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh. 2 - Harshwardhan Manikpuri S/o Adhar Das Manikpuri, Aged About 17 Years (Mentioned As 14 Years In The Impugned Order) Caste Panika Through His Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Bachan Manikpuri R/o Village Pondi, Tehsil And Police Station Pali, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 14.07 .202 5 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 following prayer:- “in the light of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and for the grounds raised hereinabove, it is most humbly prayed before this Hon’ble Court that 1. This Hon’ble Court be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case. 2. This Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to correct the error committed by the learned Court below and set aside / quash the impugned order Annexure P-1. 3. This Hon’ble Court be further pleased to pass such other orders in the favour of the petitioner, as it may deem fir in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan