NAMRATA THAKUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CWP/10622/2023 · 2025-06-06
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23995 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23995 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 10622/2023
Decided on: 06.06.2025
Namrata Thakur & Anr.
…Petitioners
Versus State of H.P. & Anr.
.…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Mr. Dixit Sahotra, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional
Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Even though the reply has not been filed, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
2. The writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:-
“ i) That respondents be directed to treat the appointment of the Petitioner no.1 and Petitioner No.2 as appointment on regular basis from the date of their initial appointment i.e., with effect from 20.01.2014 and 21.02.2012 respectively. ii) That the respondents be directed to release all consequential benefits as admissible to the Petitioners upon the regularization being conferred upon them with effect from 20.01.2014 and 21.02.2012 respectively.” 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue involved and the reliefs prayed for by the petitioners have already been adjudicated in Nitin Kumar Vs. State of H.P. and Anr2.
Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content, if the case of the petitioners is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment within a time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer.
4. Having regard to above submissions but without examining the merits of the matter, this petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 06th June, 2025(rohit) 22 CWPOA No. 1077 of 2019, decided on 22.08.2022