1 2025:CGHC:50754 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 700 of 2017 1 - Rajesh Upadhyay S/o Raghuvir Prasad Upadhyay, Aged About 33 Years R/o Old Kachaharipara, Kawardha, Police Station Kawardha, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ..............Non-Applicant No.2/ Owner Of The Offending Vehicle C.G.9 D 3508, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Durga Bai Wd/o Shiv Kumar Jhariya, Aged About 24 Years R/o Mathpara Kawardha, Police Station And Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ku. Payal D/o Late Shiv Kumar Jhariya, Aged About 3 Years Minor Through Her Legal Guardian Mother Namely Durga Bai Jhariya Wd/o Shiv Kumar Jhariya, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mathpara Kawardha, Police Station And Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 3 - Bahalram S/o Late Kejau Ram Jhariya, Aged About 60 Years R/o Mathpara Kawardha, Police Station And Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 4 - Mongra Bai W/o Bahal Ram Jhariya, Aged About 55 Years R/o Mathpara Kawardha, Police Station And Tahsil Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ................Claimants, District : Kawardha ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 5 - Heera Singh Chouhan S/o Ganga Singh Chouhan, Aged About 26 Years R/o Mathpara, Kawardha, Police Station Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh ...............Non-Applicant No.1, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 6 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, Beside L I C Office, Near Railway Station Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ..............Non-Applicant No.3, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : None. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 10.10.2025 1. This matter was called for hearing today. Despite two calls, no representation has been made on behalf of the petitioner. The counsel for the petitioner has failed to appear without any explanation. 2. In view of the petitioner’s non-prosecution and failure to prosecute the matter diligently, this petition is hereby dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Saxena