APHC010338622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0?? FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17216 OF 2025 Between: S Dilshadunnisa, W/o. S. Rahamathulla, Aged about 45 years, R/o. 8- 95, Simham Street, B.Kothakota Nagarpanchayat, B. Kothakota Mandal, Annamayya District, PIN517370. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Joint Collector, Annamayya District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Rayachoti, Annamayya District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Raichoti, Annamayya District 5. The Tahsildar, B-Kothakota, Annamayya District 6. Abdul Khadar Jeelani, S/o. JS Abdul Kareem Basha, R/o. D No.7-114, Simham Street, B.Kothakota Nagarpanchayat, B. Kothakota Mandal, Annamayya District, PIN517370. 7. JS Jafer Basha, S/o. JS Abdul Kareem Basha R/o. D No.7-103, Simham Street, B.Kothakota Nagarpanchayat, B. Kothakota Mandal, Annamayya District, PIN517370. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be . pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3’’^ respondent in not considering and dispose of the appeal ROR/ROC/2702/2024 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the 3'"'^ respondent to dispose of the appeal. f m i lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to create third party interest in any manner on the basis of revenue records related to land admeasuring 982.54 sq. yds in Sy. No.238/1 B-Kothakota Village and Mandal, Annamayya District pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010338622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17216/2025 Between: 1.S DILSHADUNNISA, W/0. S. RAHAMATHULLA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, B.KOTHAKOTANAGARPANCHAYAT, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, PIN517370. R/0. 8-95, SIMHAM STREET, B. KOTHAKOTA MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REVENUE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI 2.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER, RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAICHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 5.THETAHSILDAR, B-KOTHAKOTA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT 6.ABDUL KHADAR JEELANI, S/0. JS ABDUL KAREEM BASHA, R/0. D NO.7-114, SIMHAM STREET, B.KOTHAKOTA NAGARPANCHAYAT, B. KOTHAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, PIN517370. 7.JS JAFER BASHA, S/0. JS ABDUL KAREEM BASHA, R/0. D N0.7- 103, SIMHAM STREET, B.KOTHAKOTA NAGARPANCHAYAT, B. KOTHAKOTA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, PIN517370. 2 ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rdespondent in not considering and dispose of the appeal ROR/ROC/2702/2024 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the 5th respondent to dispose of the appeal and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to create third party interest in any manner on the basis of revenue records related to land admeasuring 982.54 sq. yds in Sy. No.238/1 B- Kothakota Village and Mandal, Annamayya District pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass s Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VVSATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 f THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17216/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- "to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3''^ respondent in not considering and dispose of the appeal ROR/ROC/2702/2024 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the 5^^ respondent to dispose of the appeal and pass such other order. ” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the ROR appeal filed by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the ROR appeal, if any pending with the respondents. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court 4 is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the The Government of India v. judgment of the Apex Court in 1 wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requestedto issue a direction to dispose of the ROR appeal, this Court find no P.Venkatesh other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the ROR appeal filed by the petitioner, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three(3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, the respondents are directed not to create any third party interest in respect of the subject property. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY, REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Joint Collector, Annamayya District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Rayachoti, Annamayya District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Raichoti, Annamayya District 5. The Tahsildar, B-Kothakota, Annamayya District 6. One CC to Sri V V Satish, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT 8. Two CD Copies. AL HIGH COURT DATED: 11/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 17216 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS