Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23985 (KAR)

SRI YOGESH v. SMT DEVAMMA

RFA/2115/2018 · 2025-07-18

Sachin Shankar Magadum

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5th DAY OF MARCH, 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT R.F.A NO.2115 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI YOGESH S/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT: NO.58/3, 9TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, SHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 010. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. SRIDEVI T.R., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. DEVAMMA W/O. LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH, NO.58/3, 9TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, SHIVANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 010. 2. SMT. M. GANGAMMA D/O LATE MUNIHANUMAIAH NO.58/3, 9TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN, SHIVANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU – 560 010. 3. RAJANNA S/O. LATE MALLAIAH, KAMAKSHIPURA, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BYTHA POST, 2 BENGALURU NORTH – 560088. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI PARAMESHWARA C.T., ADV. FOR C/R2 (A & B) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.01.2016 PASSED IN O.S.No.5927/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE XL ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.. THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:- JUDGMENT This appeal is of the year 2018. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. 3. No representation. 4. This appeal is coming up for 4th time for compliance of office objections, the appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- JUDGE GJM