Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:49237 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3815 of 2018 Petitioner :- Lal Ji Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- District Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Varanasi And 20 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Rai,Prajyot Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Daya Shankar Prasad Singh,Om Prakash Shukla,Sushma Devi Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. Re: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation / Substitution Application Nos.4 & 5, both of 2021. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners-applicants. 2. The instant applications have been filed to substitute the legal heir of deceased petitioner no.1 along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 3. The reason for condonation of delay mentioned in the affidavit is satisfactory. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. 4. Let the word 'deceased' be mentioned against the name of petitioner no.1 and the name of his legal heir as mentioned in the prayer clause of the application be substituted as petitioner no.1/1 in the array of the parties. 5. The applications are, accordingly, disposed of. Re: Civil Misc. Substitution Application No.9/2024. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners-applicants. 2. The instant application has been filed to substitute the legal heirs of deceased petitioner no.1/1. 3. Application is within limitation. 4. Let the word 'deceased' be mentioned against the name of petitioner no.1/1 and the names of his legal heirs as mentioned in the prayer clause of the application be substituted as petitioner nos.1/1/1 & 1/1/2 respectively in the array of the parties. 5. The substitution application is, accordingly, disposed of. Re: Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.14/2025. 1. Heard Sri Prajyot Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Om Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for private respondent nos. 4 to 7. 2. The instant withdrawal application has been filed along with affidavit of the petitioners with the prayer to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court, as such, the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Learned counsel for the private respondent nos. 4 to 7 has no objection to the above request of the learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the application is allowed and writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Order on writ petition 1. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 C.Prakash Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad