- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7434 WP No. 11388 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 11388 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. HARISH K.Y., S/O YELLAPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O AT KUTAGANAHALLI, SARJAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 107. 2. YELLAMMA, W/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT KUTAGANAHALLI, SARJAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 107. 3. MANJULA, D/O YELLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT KUTAGANAHALLI, SARJAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 107. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE BY CHANNARAYAPATNA CIRCLE, Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7434 WP No. 11388 of 2022 NUGGENAHALLI POLICE, REPRESENTED BY KARNATAKA STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HIGH COURT, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. SMT.SHOBHA @ THIRTHAKUMARI, W/O K.Y.HARISH, KEMBALU VILLAGE, BAGOR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATTAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 570 021. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NUGGENAHALLI POLICE STATION, CHANNARAYAPATNA CIRCLE, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. DELETED 3 & 4 AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 30.06.2022 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKAT SATHYANARAYAN, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASHING OF ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC.NO.796/2017 (CRIME NO.6/2017) ON THE FILE OF THE - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7434 WP No. 11388 of 2022 HONBLE II ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNARAYAPATNA VIDE ANNEXURE - C AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 1.15 p.m. 2. The order sheet dated 15.01.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. There is no representation. Notice was ordered to be issued to respondent No.2 during June 2022. In spite of that, process fee is not paid for issuance of notice to respondent No.2. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford one more opportunity, as a final chance, list this matter after four weeks. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:7434 WP No. 11388 of 2022 The interim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of hearing". 3. Inspite of that, process fee for issuance of notice to respondent is not paid. It is apparent that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18