Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
WP/22474/2020 · 2025-09-10
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23977 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23977 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010339162020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22474/2020 Between:
1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED,, A BANKING COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 27 BKC, C 27 G- BLOCK, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (E) MUMBAI BRANCH OFFICE AT SARPAVARAM, KAKINADA. REP, BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER/AUTHORIZED OFFICER, NARSIMHULU D, S/O D.VENKATESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMACHANDRA PURAM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P
3. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2
6. CENTRL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, AP ZONE OFFICE, VIJAYAWADA, REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, R6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER C.O.DT.01/08/2022 IN IA.NO.1/2022.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22474 of 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly the one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents in completing the investigation on the Report of the Petitioner submitted to the 1st respondent dated 21-05-2019 which was registered as FIR No. 115/2019 even after lapse of more than 18 months is illegal and consequentially to direct the Respondents to complete the investigation on the said Report and to initiate necessary prosecution in pursuance to the said Report and to take necessary steps immediately and to pass..…”
2. None represented for the petitioner.
3. The grievance of petitioner in the present petition is that the delay in the investigation in Crime No.115 of 2019, though the crime is registered about 18 months preceding to filing of the present petition.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are
directed to conclude the investigation and file a report according to law as expeditiously as possible within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order, if not already filed by this date. No order as to costs.
4
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.09.2025. UPS
5
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.22474 of 2020
Dated.11.09.2025
UPS
127